Not every brand needs a complex setup. The structure depends on how much you’re spending, and more importantly, how fast you’re looking to scale.
At £1k/day, keep it lean and focused
With smaller budgets, simplicity wins:
- One CBO campaign for scaling
- One ABO campaign for testing
- Around 30-40 ads tested each month
If an ad performs well in testing, I might bump the budget within its ABO, but I don’t rely on that long-term. It gets messy fast – especially when you’re trying to scale consistently.
At £10k/day, you need more structure and control
Higher spend means higher volume. You’re testing more – often over 100 ads a month. That requires:
- More ABO ad sets dedicated to testing
- Tighter control over spend
Here’s the catch: testing campaigns rarely drive immediate performance. That’s why I cap testing at around 25-30% of total daily spend. The rest stays focused on proven winners.
The system that works
Let your testing campaigns do their job – find what works. Then:
- Move those winning ads into a CBO campaign
- Each month, launch a fresh ad set inside that CBO using the month’s best performers
- Set minimum spend limits to keep top performers getting enough traction without letting one ad take over
Side note – Meta is merging ASC and CBO. If you’re seeing that shift in your account, don’t overthink it. The same principles still apply – test smart, scale clean.
Key follow-up question:
What’s the approach for accounts only spending 300-400 per day? Still use CBO / ASC?
Answer:
At 300–400/day, use one ASC, then test ads inside it, one at a time and keep it simple and focused for best results.
Post inspired by: Ben Radack